Friday, November 12, 2010

"Shout, O children! / Shout, you're free!"

An companion to W.E.B. Du Bois's "The Souls of Black Folk"  

           If you haven't read "The Souls of Black Folk", then go read sections I and III now. It's not that long, so we'll wait...Good, now you can read this as a companion to that part of the writing and hopefully we can all have a clearer understanding of it. One of the most enlightening parts of it is his disagreement with Booker T. Washington (Sec. III). These two Black leaders had very different views of to best way for Blacks to integrate into American society as equals. We see this same dichotomy of comflicting paths to equality again and agian throughout Black history in America. In the long run, the basic views of Mr. Du Bois are the preferred method, but it is interesting to think about how different things might (or might not) be if Mr. Washington's method had been applied.

"The Souls of Black Folk"
The first passage of this writing is a poetic account of black history in America since emancipation. Du Bois recounts his first experience with racism and how, even as a child, it changed him personally. It made him bitter and separate and then, later, it motivated him by way of vengeance and a personal sense of greatness and responsibility. He uses this personal change to mirror the struggle of the free Blacks in America.
He feels that it is hard to be both American and black. He would not destroy either, because both have something to offer the world. He cannot be both, because the ends are to divergent. To raise him up with skill, only sets contempt against him; and to remain ignorant leaves his potential unused. This situation leaves him the worst of both, an ignorant vagabond. He could use the skill he had to raise his people up; the world hated him for the skill and for being black, so he could not accomplish equality or find acceptance from anyone. This sets the beginning of the cycle of an unfulfilled want of a Black identity.
Blacks tried to follow the elusive gifts from freedom without success. Then the fifteenth(15th) Amendment came and Blacks could vote. They took this power, but to no lasting avail. So some Blacks tried traditional book learning. However, all who measured their success did so to point out the negative and did not allow them any real material gain or success. From this, they did get self-insight and a sense of their own power and mission. Blacks knew they had to be themselves to gain a position in the world and so they analyzed this new thought. They felt the social degradation and the poverty of their being, a poverty caused by generations of slavery mixed with a resulting ignorance, and this was all they had to compete against Whites, who were the culture and the society and the law. In addition, a stain covered their body, the evidence of the rape of their ancestral women by White people and their legal institutions. This robbed them of their African honor and purity and only gave them the curse of evil blood in their veins that sensed to destroy their self-image as a people. Again, we see an attempt at seeing where they fit in, as a people, and coming away from the experience dejected.
This situation should allow them time for introspection and self-healing, but the world moves on an unrelentingly judges them against the standard set by others. Whites gloat over the failures, obfuscate the successes, and explain away prejudice as a natural and right way of living. Blacks seek agreement in understanding when applying this sensibly, such as cultural differences, but they are helpless against that racism that pervades all things and wants nothing but to perpetuate it and set discouragement as the natural state of all Black people. With this total assault against their spirit, came the loss of initiative and a racial depression and hopelessness. They lamented their ignorance and questioned the value of knowledge or of voting, since, by force or fraud, it gave them nothing in the end. White society echoed this depression on them and told them to be content with their sad lot as their appropriate place. Here, I believe, the depression is finally strong enough to cause that total rebuilding of thought
Out of this despair came a great awakening that showed them that each of the things they sought were wrong, not for what they were, but for what they were not. Each of the prizes politics, education, and others need combining and forming with a Negro identity that will appeal to the American Republic so that eventually they can be strong, teach to, and learn from the White race. They begin not without, but with their own prizes to give. Their music, folk tales, and other cultural history has become the American culture in the time they have been here in bondage and free.
Their goal, as Du Bois sees it, is to give dynamic life to a clinical society of money and data. They will add this to America with the heart of their historic race, and in the name of human opportunity. It is a high ideal that has borne true since then. Unfortunately, his concept of the underlying contempt for his people and the unsettled identity of his people, because of their tumultuous history, have also shown as an accurate account even today.


Afterword - This is the most interesting conflict in American history (Civil War re-enactors be damned). It is a situation that is unique in the modern world. Only in America was a legally enslaved people freed into a modern society and back by a conflicted federal republican government that hated and helped them, depending on the state, the issue, and the administration. Over a hundred and fifty years, American political thinkers have been trying to solve the problem that slavery created. Great men such as W.E.B Du Bois, Booker T. Washington, then later Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and their contemporary counterparts such as Cornel West and Thurgood Marshall won't let the issue of racial inequality in America settle in the dust of history until it is destroyed and we are a truly united society.


Suggested Readings: Everyone has surely read or heard Martin Luther King Jr's "I have a Dream" (The greatest piece of American oratory that was surprisingly ineffective.) and now you have also read W.E.B. Du Bois's "The Souls of Black Folk". A good continuance into the applicable thoughts on these issues in a modern light are, Thurgood Marshall's "The Constitution's Bicentennial: Commemorating the Wrong Document?" (It is an intriguing title for a Supreme Court Justice to write.) and the book Race Matters, by Cornel West (about the cultural aftermath of the L.A. riots).


                                                                                -  Japheth

4 comments:

  1. "It is a situation that is unique in the modern world. Only in America was a legally enslaved people freed into a modern society and back by a conflicted federal republican government that hated and helped them, depending on the state, the issue, and the administration. Over a hundred and fifty years, American political thinkers have been trying to solve the problem that slavery created. "

    Just wanted to say that I love this particular passage. I would love to hear how you think America is dealing with this currently. I personally think that the problems slavery created still exist because they've continually evolved into something else like Jim Crow laws and currently, if you believe the evidence in Michelle Alexander's "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness," in the war on drugs. Anyway, just interested in hearing those thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lindsey, I am glad you are also interested in these issues and I would like to answer in two parts and posts. First, what we aren’t doing. As you know, our legal system is set up to punish violent offenders disproportionately to non-violent ones and violent crime has always been more accessible than non-violent crime because violence is workable with minimum skill, education, and resources (whereas non-violent crime needs at least one of those in good amount). Recognize that our economic lower class is predominately minority (especially in large cities where violent crime is higher) and you get the result that we have. Blacks and minorities are in jail more often and for longer periods than Whites. That problem can only justly be changed outside of the legal system, though. Its real solution comes with the social equalization of the races.
    I do believe in what Du Bois, Hughes, and Frederick Douglass said about Blacks needing to take more initiative in resisting the urge to believe that what they have is good enough for them. I will never forget a news report that I saw when I was a teenager. The report was about a public housing reform and I remember one of the people questioned. I Black man with a small (8 year old) child was being interviewed in the housing projects and asked what he thought. He responded that he liked it saying "That way my son will have a better place to live when he grows up. He's not a rapper. He can't play ball so he's never gonna get outta here." - That instantly hit me. As far as this man knows, his son can only escape poverty through one in a million fame as musician or athlete. I am a father and cannot imagine ever discounting my son's ability to do anything within reason and making at least a middle class income is definitely within reason. I don't have any reason to believe he is a bad father, so I have to look elsewhere for the fact that he has completely resigned not only his life, but the life of his son's as forfeit to poverty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Now what we are doing and can do. As far as a direct answer to your question of how America is dealing with Black racial inequality, it is not. The North West is very openly racist, but with a Black population, it goes unnoticed. The South is historically racist and is a weird mix of current racism (Gena, LA) and Black empowerment (Atlanta, GA) so that is a sort of wash as far as most are concerned. The west coast is socially liberal, but still white dominated and as the purveyors of much of our media, they deal mainly with whites under the guise of "representing America". The "token Black guy" is such a well known truth that the media itself mocks it. That leaves the southwest, where Blacks are basically left alone in favor of hating Hispanics for causing everything from the recession to TB (with varying levels of truth that keep it seemingly credible). That takes care of all of the people by region so the only redemption will come from the representative gov't. Luckily, republican gov't is made to overcome just this type of hurdle (read Madison's Federalist 10 for the purpose of representatives and the "enlightened statesman"). It is in the state and local gov't that we can effect change. Virginia did this by outlawing cross burning (even though the Sup. Court overturned the law for good reason) and the Fed. gov't does this continually with legislation such as hate crime statutes and FBI civil rights investigations. Though some of these measures can be abused and create other issues (hate crime, affirmative action), they do serve a purpose and would not be created if they were not needed. I believe that these misguided measures are helpful at spotlighting these racial issues and that as a result of them (whether through their use or public education about the issue as a result of negative sentiment), positive change can happen.
    The real issue is personal prejudice and nothing will get much better until people do. Liberal gov’t is designed to protect individual freedoms, including the freedom to hate and no piece of legislation can outsmart a person who wishes to discriminate against another person.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Japheth,
    First of all, you're right. Our minorities have to say "this is not good enough." The example about the father makes me so sad. I had a student (7th grader) tell me when he grew up he wanted to be on welfare like his mom and dad were. :( He was such a bright little guy- excellent at math especially- but was no where, except MAYBE in school, being encouraged to move beyond his family's state. I tried to explain to him that welfare was a wonderful "stepping stone" and that it might be a great thing if he needed it to help him get to where he needed to go, but that he could go beyond that and be self-sufficient without welfare. I don't think that had ever been suggested to him.
    I don't know what I think about the second post. You've obviously given this a lot of thought and concern so I would need to consider all the thoughts you've given. I don't have an answer, but I appreciate yours. :) This blog is fun!

    ReplyDelete